Biomass Chemical Engineering ›› 2023, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 60-70.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5854.2023.04.008
• Review Comment • Previous Articles Next Articles
Hengtao GUO(), Xuetao WANG(), Lili XING, Haojie LI, Haoshan ZHAI
Received:
2022-06-29
Online:
2023-07-30
Published:
2023-07-08
Contact:
Xuetao WANG
E-mail:ght970112@163.com;wxt7682@163.com
CLC Number:
Hengtao GUO, Xuetao WANG, Lili XING, Haojie LI, Haoshan ZHAI. Research Advance in Biomass Steam Catalytic Reforming for Hydrogen Production[J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2023, 57(4): 60-70.
Table 1
Effects of different kinds of catalysis on hydrogen production from biomass steam reforming"
催化剂 catalyst | 生物质原料 biomass raw material | 反应条件 reaction condition | 结果 result | 文献 ref. |
Fe-Ce/白云石 | 松木屑 | 反应温度900 ℃,水流量1 g/min | 与无催化剂的气化试验相比,产气率增加0.15 m3/kg,产氢率增加16.27 g/kg,V(H2)由39.02%升至46.95% | [ |
橄榄石 | 松木屑 | 解耦双回路气化系统,气化反应器700 ℃,重整反应器850 ℃,n(H2O)∶n(C)=1.2 | 相比于石英砂,气体产率由0.8 m3/kg增至1.0 m3/kg, 焦油由77.1 g/m3降至13.9 g/m3,H2 38.8% | [ |
褐铁矿 | 松木颗粒 | 气化温度700 ℃,蒸汽流量0.9 kg/h | V(H2)64.8% | [ |
碱金属成分 | 玉米芯炭 | 反应温度900 ℃,水蒸气流量0.4 g/min | KOH 6%时玉米芯炭的产氢率为197.8 g/kg | [ |
Ni基催化剂 | 乙酸 | 反应温度为700 ℃,n(H2O)∶n(C)=2.5,液时空速(LHSV)=10 h-1 | KOH碱化耦合HNO3酸化制备的Ni/biochar催化剂碳转化率91.2%, 氢气产率71.2% | [ |
MFe2O4(M=Ni,Co,Mn)尖晶石 | 乙醇 | 反应温度250~700 ℃ | 650 ℃时MnFe2O4的最大氢产率达94.6% | [ |
CoFe2O4、CuFe2O4和MgFe2O4 | 沼气 | V(CH4)∶V(CO2)=1∶1 GHSV=6 000 h-1,反应温度800 ℃ | 3种催化剂中CuFe2O4的催化性能最佳,获得氢气和一氧化碳选择性分别为87.60%和89.79% | [ |
1 |
AZIZ M , DARMAWAN A , JUANGSA F B . Hydrogen production from biomasses and wastes: A technological review[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46 (68): 33756- 33781.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.189 |
2 |
AMOOZEGAR M A , SAFARPOUR A , NOGHABI K A , et al. Halophiles and their vast potential in biofuel production[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2019, 10, 1- 17.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00001 |
3 | LEPAGE T, KAMMOUN M, SCHMETZ Q, et al. Biomass-to-hydrogen: A review of main routes production, processes evaluation and techno-economical assessment[J/OL]. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2021, 144: 105920[2022-06-20]. http://doi.org.10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105920. |
4 |
TAN R S , ABDULLAH T A T , JOHARI A , et al. Catalytic steam reforming of tar for enhancing hydrogen production from biomass gasification: A review[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2020, 14 (3): 545- 569.
doi: 10.1007/s11708-020-0800-2 |
5 |
CHUANG K H , CHEN B N , WEY M Y . Enrichment of hydrogen production from biomass-gasification-derived syngas over spinel-type aluminate-supported nickel catalysts[J]. Energy Technology, 2018, 6 (2): 318- 325.
doi: 10.1002/ente.201700473 |
6 | ZHANG Z H, OU Z L, QIN C L, et al. Roles of alkali/alkaline earth metals in steam reforming of biomass tar for hydrogen production over perovskite supported Ni catalysts[J/OL]. Fuel, 2019, 257: 116032[2022-06-20]. http://doi.org.10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116032. |
7 |
ZOU J , OLADIPO J , FU S L , et al. Hydrogen production from cellulose catalytic gasification catalyst on CeO2/Fe2O3[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 171, 241- 248.
doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.104 |
8 | ZHAO Z K , SITUMORANG Y A , AN P , et al. Hydrogen production from catalytic steam reforming of bio-oils: A critical review[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2020, 43 (4): 625- 640. |
9 |
SETIABUDI H D , AZIZ M A A , ABDULLAH S , et al. Hydrogen production from catalytic steam reforming of biomass pyrolysis oil or bio-oil derivatives: A review[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45 (36): 18376- 18397.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.141 |
10 | CHONG C C, CHENG Y W, NG K H, et al. Bio-hydrogen production from steam reforming of liquid biomass wastes and biomass-derived oxygenates: A review[J/OL]. Fuel, 2022, 311[2022-06-20]. http://doi.org.10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122623. |
11 | 李亮荣, 付兵, 刘艳, 等. 生物质衍生物重整制氢研究进展[J]. 无机盐工业, 2021, 53, 12- 17. |
12 | 谢建军, 阴秀丽, 黄艳琴, 等. 生物油水溶性组分重整制氢研究进展及关键问题分析[J]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2011, 27, 829- 838. |
13 |
LIU X Y , YI C X , CHEN L , et al. Synergy of steam reforming and K2CO3 modification on wood biomass pyrolysis[J]. Cellulose, 2019, 26 (10): 6049- 6060.
doi: 10.1007/s10570-019-02480-3 |
14 |
AKUBO K , NAHIL M A , WILLIAMS P T . Pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming of agricultural biomass wastes and biomass components for production of hydrogen/syngas[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2019, 92 (6): 1987- 1996.
doi: 10.1016/j.joei.2018.10.013 |
15 | 贾爽, 应浩, 孙云娟, 等. 生物质水蒸气气化制取富氢合成气及其应用的研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37, 497- 504. |
16 | 亚力昆江·吐尔逊, 潘岳, 别尔德汗·瓦提汗, 等. 基于热解-重整-燃烧解耦三床气化系统的生物质催化制富氢气体[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34, 222- 228. |
17 | 赵雨佳, 邹俊, 胡俊豪, 等. CeO2添加比例对Fe基催化剂催化纤维素气化制氢的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36, 269- 274. |
18 | 谢思凡, 胡建军, 张全国, 等. 秸秆热解催化重整制备合成气实验研究及模型预测[J]. 可再生能源, 2020, 38, 1149- 1156. |
19 |
ZHU H L , PASTOR-PEREZ L , MILLAN M . Catalytic steam reforming of toluene: Understanding the influence of the main reaction parameters over a reference catalyst[J]. Energies, 2020, 13 (4): 813.
doi: 10.3390/en13040813 |
20 | GARCÍA R, GIL M V, RUBIERA F, et al. Renewable hydrogen production from biogas by sorption enhanced steam reforming(SESR): A parametric study[J/OL]. Energy, 2021, 218: 119491[2022-06-20]. http://doi.org.10.1016/j.energy.2020.119491. |
21 | 孙宁, 应浩, 徐卫, 等. 松木屑催化气化制取富氢燃气[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36, 2158- 2163. |
22 | 谢华清, 袁佳伟, 蓝碧兰, 等. 基于双效催化剂的生物油吸附强化重整实验[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 40, 1721- 1725. |
23 | LANDA L, REMIRO A, DE LA TORRE R, et al. Global vision from the thermodynamics of the effect of the bio-oil composition and the reforming strategies in the H2 production and the energy requirement[J/OL]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 239: 114181[2022-06-20]. http://doi.org.10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114181. |
24 |
UNLU D , HILMIOGLU N D . Application of aspen plus to renewable hydrogen production from glycerol by steam reforming[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45 (5): 3509- 3515.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.02.106 |
25 |
TAN R S , ABDULLAH T A T , JALIL A A , et al. Optimization of hydrogen production from steam reforming of biomass tar over Ni/dolomite/La2O3 catalysts[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2020, 93 (3): 1177- 1186.
doi: 10.1016/j.joei.2019.11.001 |
26 | TAN R S, ABDULLAH T A T, RIPIN A, et al. Hydrogen-rich gas production by steam reforming of gasified biomass tar over Ni/dolomite/La2O3 catalyst[J/OL]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2019, 7(6): 103490[2022-06-20]. http://doi.org.10.1016/j.jece.2019.103490. |
27 |
SHIN J , KANG M S , HWANG J . Effects of bio-syngas CO2 concentration on water-gas shift and side reactions with Fe-Cr based catalyst[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2021, 45 (2): 1857- 1866.
doi: 10.1002/er.5861 |
28 | 牛永红, 刘琨琨, 蔡尧尧, 等. 生物质Fe-Ce/白云石催化剂催化气化试验研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51, 361- 366. |
29 | 肖亚辉, 刘勇, 乔聪震, 等. 解耦双回路气化系统中生物质催化水蒸气气化制富氢气体[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2019, 47, 1430- 1439. |
30 |
NIU Y H , HAN F T , CHEN Y S , et al. Experimental study on steam gasification of pine particles for hydrogen-rich gas[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2017, 90 (5): 715- 724.
doi: 10.1016/j.joei.2016.07.006 |
31 | 贾爽, 应浩, 徐卫, 等. 生物质炭水蒸气气化制取富氢合成气[J]. 化工进展, 2018, 37, 1402- 1407. |
32 |
CHEN J H , WANG M J , WANG S R , et al. Hydrogen production via steam reforming of acetic acid over biochar-supported nickel catalysts[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43 (39): 18160- 18168.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.048 |
33 |
DOLGYKH L Y , STOLYARCHUK I L , VASYLENKO I V , et al. Influence of the composition of nanosized MFe2O4 spinels(M=Ni, Co, Mn) on their catalytic properties in the steam reforming of ethanol[J]. Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry, 2013, 49 (3): 185- 192.
doi: 10.1007/s11237-013-9313-y |
34 | 周亮, 姚金刚, 易维明, 等. 尖晶石MFe2O4(M=Co、Cu、Mg)催化沼气重整制氢研究[J]. 山东理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 34, 1-6, 10 |
35 | 于建华, 袁红艳, 徐绍平, 等. Ni-Fe/坡缕石催化水蒸气重整杏核热解焦油制氢[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2008, 42, 1049- 1053. |
36 | HERVY M , OLCESE R , BETTAHAR M M , et al. Evolution of dolomite composition and reactivity during biomass gasification[J]. Applied Catalysis A-General, 2019, 572, 97- 106. |
37 | 刘少敏, 储磊, 陈明强, 等. 固定床中甘油催化重整制氢[J]. 石油化工, 2013, 42, 1197- 1201. |
38 | TAN R S , ABDULLAH T A T , MAHMUD S A , et al. Catalytic steam reforming of complex gasified biomass tar model toward hydrogen over dolomite promoted nickel catalysts[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44 (39): 21303- 21314. |
39 | CAO Y , BAI Y , DU J . Study on gasification characteristics of pine sawdust using olivine as in-bed material for combustible gas production[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2021, 96, 168- 172. |
40 | XIN S Z, ZHANG Y H, DUAN L H, et al. Microwave-assisted calcined olivine catalyst steam reforming of tar for hydrogen production[J/OL]. Energy Sources Part a-Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects, 2020: 1-8[2022-06-20]. http://doi.org.10.1080/15567036.2020.1716112. |
41 | BASU S , PRADHAN N C . Selective production of hydrogen by acetone steam reforming over Ni-Co/olivine catalysts[J]. Reaction Kinetics Mechanisms and Catalysis, 2019, 127 (1): 357- 373. |
42 | QUAN C , XU S P , ZHOU C C . Steam reforming of bio-oil from coconut shell pyrolysis over Fe/olivine catalyst[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 141, 40- 47. |
43 | KANNARI N , SATOMI C , OYAMA Y , et al. Durability studies of limonite ore for catalytic decomposition of phenol as a model biomass tar in a fluidized bed[J]. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2017, 107, 86- 92. |
44 | ZHAO X Y , REN J , CAO J P , et al. Catalytic reforming of volatiles from biomass pyrolysis for hydrogen-rich gas production over limonite ore[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31 (4): 4054- 4060. |
45 | 赵洁霞. 生物质热解过程中碱金属的析出规律及催化特性研究[D]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2017. |
46 | 张玉洁, 王焦飞, 卫俊涛, 等. 碱金属赋存形态对水稻秸秆热解过程的影响机制[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2021, 49, 752- 758. |
47 | 蔡建军, 王清成, 王全. 碱金属离子对生物质的催化热解及气化实验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2016, 37, 1631- 1635. |
48 | 江龙. 生物质热解气化过程中内在碱金属、碱土金属的迁移及催化特性研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2013. |
49 | HONG T , WANG S R . Experimental study of the effect of acid-washing pretreatment on biomass pyrolysis[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2009, 37 (6): 668- 672. |
50 | YIP K , TIAN F , HAYASHI J I , et al. Effect of alkali and alkaline earth metallic species on biochar reactivity and syngas compositions during steam gasification[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24 (1): 173- 181. |
51 | LV D , XU M , LIU X , et al. Effect of cellulose, lignin, alkali and alkaline earth metallic species on biomass pyrolysis and gasification[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2010, 91 (8): 903- 909. |
52 | EBADI A G , HISORIEV H , ZARNEGAR M , et al. Hydrogen and syngas production by catalytic gasification of algal biomass(Cladophora glomerata L.) using alkali and alkaline-earth metals compounds[J]. Environmental Technology, 2019, 40 (9): 1178- 1184. |
53 | CHAIKLANGMUANG S , LI L Y , KANNARI N , et al. Performance of active nickel loaded lignite char catalyst on conversion of coffee residue into rich-synthesis gas by gasification[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2018, 91 (2): 222- 232. |
54 | MENOR M , SAYAS S , CHICA A . Natural sepiolite promoted with Ni as new and efficient catalyst for the sustainable production of hydrogen by steam reforming of the biodiesel by-products glycerol[J]. Fuel, 2017, 193, 351- 358. |
55 | LARIMI A , KHORASHEH F . Renewable hydrogen production by ethylene glycol steam reforming over Al2O3 supported Ni-Pt bimetallic nano-catalysts[J]. Renewable Energy, 2018, 128, 188- 199. |
56 | BIZKARRA K , BERMUDEZ J M , ARCELUS-ARRILLAGA P , et al. Nickel based monometallic and bimetallic catalysts for synthetic and real bio-oil steam reforming[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43 (26): 11706- 11718. |
57 | 庆绍军, 侯晓宁, 刘雅杰, 等. Cu-Ni-Al尖晶石催化甲醇水蒸气重整制氢性能的研究[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2018, 46, 1210- 1217. |
58 | 刘雅杰, 康荷菲, 侯晓宁, 等. Cu-Ni-Al尖晶石催化甲醇重整制氢: Al含量的影响[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2020, 48, 1112- 1121. |
59 | LIU Y J , QING S J , HOU X N , et al. Cu-Ni-Al spinel oxide as an efficient durable catalyst for methanol steam reforming[J]. Chemcatchem, 2018, 10 (24): 5698- 5706. |
60 | GARAI M H S , KHOSRAVI-NIKOU M R , SHARIATI A . Chemical looping steam methane reforming via Ni-ferrite supported on cerium and zirconium oxides[J]. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2020, 43 (9): 1813- 1822. |
61 | DOLGYKH L Y , STOLYARCHUK I L , STARAYA L A , et al. Catalytic properties of CuFe2O4 in steam reforming of ethanol[J]. Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry, 2015, 51 (4): 230- 235. |
62 | 李光俊, 郗宏娟, 张素红, 等. 尖晶石CuM2O4(M=Al、Fe、Cr)催化甲醇重整反应的特性[J]. 燃料化学学报, 2012, 40, 1466- 1471. |
63 | STOLYARCHUK I L , DOLGIKH L Y , VASILENKO I V , et al. Catalysis of steam reforming of ethanol by nanosized manganese ferrite for hydrogen production[J]. Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry, 2012, 48 (2): 129- 134. |
64 | STOLYARCHUK I L , DOLGYKH L Y , VASYLENKO I V , et al. Ferrites MFe2O4(M=Mg, Mn, Fe, Zn) as Catalysts for Steam Reforming of Ethanol[J]. Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry, 2016, 52 (4): 246- 251. |
65 | DOLGYKH L Y , STOLYARCHUK I L , STARAYA L A , et al. Catalytic Properties of MnO, Fe2O3, and MnFe2O4 in the Steam Reforming of Ethanol[J]. Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry, 2014, 50 (4): 245- 249. |
[1] | Yihu KE, Chunmei ZHU, Jingyun LI, Hai LIU, Hong YUAN. Catalytic Oxidation of Glycerol to Glyceric Acid over Transition Metal Modified Nitrogened-doped Porous Carbon Supported Pt Catalyst [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2023, 57(2): 29-40. |
[2] | Zhenglong XUE, Guanhua WANG, Hao SUN, Yunli ZHAO, Chuanling SI, Hongyu JIA. Research Status and Development Trend of Bio-based Dust Suppressants [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2023, 57(2): 62-70. |
[3] | Mengjie CAI, Jun RAO, Yajie HU, Dan SUN, Feng PENG. Research Progress on Hydrothermal Synthesisand and Application of Biomass Porous Carbon Materials [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2023, 57(2): 79-88. |
[4] | Jianhua WANG, Sisi ZHANG, Yuting ZHUANG, Qiong XU, Dulin YIN. Research Progress on Heterogenous Catalytic Conversion of Furfural to γ-Valerolactone by One-pot Reaction [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2023, 57(1): 62-72. |
[5] | Meixin WANG, Yawei ZHAN, Tengfei MA, Zhiqiang LI. Catalytic Conversion of Bamboo for 5-Hydroxymethyl Furfural Production: A Review [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2023, 57(1): 73-83. |
[6] | Qin CHENG, Ziyang WU, Yan MA, Jun YE, Weihong TAN. Research Progress on Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Lignocellulosic Fiber [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2023, 57(1): 84-98. |
[7] | Yun ZHOU, Haiping YANG, Jun ZOU, Zihao LIU, Hanping CHEN. Correlation Analysis Between Characteristics of Feedstock and Thermogravimetric/Pyrolytic Characteristics of Herb Residues [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2022, 56(6): 8-16. |
[8] | Si LI, Shaojian JIANG, Changzhu LI, Xudong LIU, Aihua ZHANG, Zhihong XIAO. Pyrolysis Characteristics and Kinetics Analysis of Algae Residue [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2022, 56(6): 36-42. |
[9] | Xinyue GAO, Shizhen YUAN, Junjie WENG, Pengbo ZHAO, Chang'an WANG, Defu CHE. Research Progress of NOx Control Technology in Biomass-fired Boiler [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2022, 56(6): 51-60. |
[10] | Tianhe WANG, Lin LIN, Jing LIU, Qiang ZHANG, Wenbiao XU, Junyou SHI. Research Progress of Heteroatom-doped Biomass-based Carbon Materials [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2022, 56(6): 71-80. |
[11] | Xingli DENG, Shaojian JIANG, Zhihong XIAO, Changzhu LI, Xudong LIU, Ying LI. Thermal Behavior and Kinetic Analysis for Co-pyrolysis of Camellia oleifera Shell and Polypropylene [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2022, 56(5): 37-42. |
[12] | Biao MA, Ru LI. Evaluation and Product Analysis of Large-scale Continuous Biomass Carbonization Equipment [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2022, 56(5): 43-50. |
[13] | Xiaopeng SHI, Zhongfeng ZHANG, Xiaoru WANG, Pan LI, Shuqi FANG, Chun CHANG. Research Progress of Carbon-based Catalysts Applied in Thermal Conversion Process [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2022, 56(5): 72-78. |
[14] | Haihong XIA, Minghao ZHOU, Changzhou CHEN, Peng LIU, Jing LI, Jianchun JIANG. Research Progress on Furfural Hydrogenation Using Metal Catalysis in Aqueous Medium [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2022, 56(4): 39-48. |
[15] | Lei WANG, Xinyuan BI, Fei YE, Yibei LIU, Min WU, Peng LU. Research Progress of Biomass-based Porous Materials on Thermal Insulation Materials [J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2022, 56(4): 58-66. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||