一种增脂剂对云南松增脂效果及生理活性的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5854.2022.02.003

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to improve the tapping yield of Pinus yunnanensis oleoresin, a nutritional tapping irritant agent was used. The efficiency of the agent and the influence of it to the physiological indexes of P. yunnanensis needles were investigated. The results showed that the maximum tapping yield increase reached to 41.08% with an average increase rate of 34.76%. The wet weight, dry weight, total chlorophyll content and soluble protein content of P. yunnanensis needle increased by 11.02%, 10.26%, 13.03% and 40.96%, respectively. The contents of superoxide dismutase(SOD), peroxidase(POD) and catalase(CAT) in the needle cells of P. yunnanensis also increased, which increased the resistance of P. yunnanensis. The content of malondialdehyde(MDA) and the relative electrical conductivity in pine needles decreased, which increased the stability of endomembrane system and enhanced the ability of P. yunnanensis to resist adversity.

Key words: tapping irritant agent, Pinus yunnanensis Franch., oleoresin yield, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, catalase

CLC Number:

TQ351.44

Ruiling WANG, Chunhua WU, Xiangyi LIU, Jianxiang LIU, Zhifeng ZHENG. Effect of a Tapping Irritant Agent on Oleoresin Yield and Physiological Indexes of Pinus yunnanensis Franch.[J]. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2022, 56(2): 14-18.

Figures/Tables 5

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

References 28

1	魏永成, 刘青华, 周志春, 等. 马尾松不同产脂力无性系光合特性差异分析[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2015, 43 (2): 36- 41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2015.02.009
2	杨章旗. 马尾松材性与产脂性状遗传改良研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2012.
3	COPPEN J J, HONE G A. Gum Naval Stores: Turpentine and Rosin from Pine Resin[M]. Rome: [s. n. ], 1995.
4	KELKAR V M , GEILS B W , BECKER D R , et al. How to recover more value from small pine trees: Essential oils and resins[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2006, 30 (4): 316- 320. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.07.009
5	刘莉, 饶小平, 宋湛谦, 等. 我国松香改性产品及其应用的专利研究新进展[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2015, 49 (2): 53- 58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5854.2015.02.12
6	YU C L , CHEN C W , GONG Q H , et al. Preparation of polymer microspheres with a rosin moiety from rosin ester styrene and divinylbenzene[J]. Polymer International, 2012, 61 (11): 1619- 1626. doi: 10.1002/pi.4249
7	GU Y , CHEN Y X , ZHAO Z D , et al. Study on chromaticity variation relationships of rosin under high temperature treatment[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 396/397/398, 1157- 1163.
8	彭慧娟, 桑军, 王春华, 等. 季铵盐的抑菌性及其对原皮防腐效果的研究[J]. 中国皮革, 2015, 44 (9): 19- 23.
9	HAN G C , HAN Y , WANG X Y , et al. Synthesis of organic rectorite with novel gemini surfactants for copper removal[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 7 (30): 35- 42.
10	张忠涛. 我国松香产业发展现状及发展策略[R]. 南宁: 2013中国松香产业高峰论坛, 2013.
11	董静曦, 郭辉军, 张子翼, 等. 近10年来我国松脂资源的动态变化-基于"连清"数据的动态评估[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52 (12): 112- 122. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20161214
12	徐高峰, 周皓, 史正军, 等. 加快云南省松香产业发展对策研究[J]. 云南林业, 2019, (4): 66- 69.
13	张宪政. 植物叶绿素含量测定-丙酮乙醇混合液法[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 1986, (3): 28- 30.
14	李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
15	李琳, 焦新之. 应用蛋白染色剂考马斯蓝D-250测定蛋白质的方法[J]. 植物生理学报, 1980, (6): 54- 57.
16	宋小青, 赵晓瑜, 刘建荣, 等. 玉米SOD的分离与纯化[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2006, 29 (6): 9- 12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1573.2006.06.003
17	SRIVASTAVA O P , HUYSTEE R B V . Evidence for close association of peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase and IAA oxidase isozymes of peanut suspension culture medium[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany, 1973, 51 (11): 2207- 2215. doi: 10.1139/b73-283
18	高俊风. 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 西安: 世界图书出版西安有限公司, 2000.
19	陈爱葵, 韩瑞宏, 李东洋, 等. 植物松针相对电导率测定方法比较研究[J]. 广东教育学院学报, 2010, 30 (5): 88- 91.
20	谢善高, 李梦华, 郑小贤. 主要测树因子对马尾松产脂量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40 (5): 2733- 2736, 2738. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2012.05.068
21	翁海龙, 贾红亮, 陈宏伟, 等. 思茅松高产脂优树产脂量相关因子分析[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2008, 36 (11): 69- 70.
22	熊晖. 云南松泌脂量与解剖及生理生化特征的关系研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2017.
23	陈晓明. 马尾松相关基因挖掘及表达规律研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2018.
24	郑元英, 付玉狮, 邹高顺, 等. 马尾松针叶中营养元素的分析和幼林施肥效益[J]. 福建林业科技, 1989, (2): 20- 26.
25	陈定国, 李春惠. 中国松树松脂生产技术[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2009.
26	覃华勇. 菜用甘薯水培品种与营养液配方筛选及水培与土培的对比研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2018.
27	曹继敏, 何德. 铅胁迫后旱柳无性系3种抗氧化酶的变化分析[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2020, 35 (4): 7- 12.
28	GAWE S , WARDAS M , NIEDWOROK E , et al. Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a lipid peroxidation marker[J]. Wiadomos'ci Lekarskie, 2004, 57 (9/10): 453- 455.

月份 months	产脂量resin yield/g		增脂率/% resin increasing rate
月份 months	对照control	增脂剂tapping irritant agent	增脂率/% resin increasing rate
5	160.23±11.87^b	206.57±17.78^a	28.92
6	135.79±12.15^b	185.47±9.51^a	36.59
7	118.27±5.61^b	166.85±8.71^a	41.08
8	137.52±9.64^b	190.67±7.02^a	38.64
9	162.81±6.76^b	217.30±10.43^a	33.46
10	131.06±8.27^b	170.17±7.72^a	29.84

月份 months	鲜质量fresh leaves weight/g		鲜质量增加率/% increasing rate of fresh weight	干质量dry leaves weight/g		干质量增加率/% increasing rate of dry weight
月份 months	对照 control	增脂剂 tapping irriant agent	鲜质量增加率/% increasing rate of fresh weight	对照 control	增脂剂 tapping irriant agent	干质量增加率/% increasing rate of dry weight
6	3.198±0.021^b	3.501±0.023^a	9.47	1.069±0.013^b	1.107±0.006^a	3.55
8	2.877±0.022^b	3.122±0.018^a	8.52	0.819±0.007^b	0.903±0.006^a	10.26
10	2.631±0.032^b	2.921±0.022^a	11.02	0.777±0.009^b	0.826±0.011^a	6.18

月份 months	叶绿素/(mg·g^-1) chlorophyll		可溶性糖/% soluble sugar content		可溶性蛋白/(mg·g^-1) soluble protein content
月份 months	对照 control	增脂剂 tapping irritant agent	对照 control	增脂剂 tapping irritant agent	对照 control	增脂剂 tapping irritant agent
6	8.44±0.08^b	8.66±0.04^a	4.31±0.08^a	4.02±0.10^b	64.79±2.53^b	75.89±3.04^a
8	9.24±0.06^b	10.43±0.05^a	6.22±0.17^a	5.68±0.10^b	77.25±6.58^b	100.78±4.05^a
10	11.05±0.04^b	12.49±0.04^a	8.22±0.13^b	8.84±0.18^a	102.32±9.19^b	144.24±8.51^a

月份 months	SOD/(U·g·min^-1)		CAT/(mg·g^-1·min^-1)		POD/(U·g^-1·min^-1)
月份 months	对照 control	增脂剂 tapping irritant agent	对照 control	增脂剂 tapping irritant agent	对照 control	增脂剂 tapping irritant agent
6	74.24±7.99^b	129.11±8.39^a	185.45±8.39^b	244.43±6.01^a	0.62±0.08^b	0.83±0.07^a
8	124.38±3.96^b	191.92±7.93^a	145.35±7.91^b	197.70±7.17^a	0.91±0.06^b	1.27±0.04^a
10	220.23±9.01^b	399.82±9.49^a	241.23±9.49^b	317.79±9.32^a	1.09±0.08^b	1.59±0.08^a

月份months	MDA/(μmol·g^-1)		相对电导率relative conductivity/%
月份months	对照control	增脂剂tapping irritant agent	对照control	增脂剂tapping irritant agent
6	3.97±0.09^a	3.07±0.22^b	27.83±0.59^a	21.70±0.41^b
8	5.47±0.31^a	4.01±0.17^b	33.22±0.44^a	25.25±0.60^b
10	9.04±0.29^a	5.24±0.21^b	41.78±0.85^a	29.84±0.47^b

Effect of a Tapping Irritant Agent on Oleoresin Yield and Physiological Indexes of Pinus yunnanensis Franch.

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 28

Related Articles 1

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments