机械力预处理磷酸法与传统磷酸法制备活性炭

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5854.2018.03.005

生物质化学工程 ›› 2018, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (3): 29-34.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5854.2018.03.005

机械力预处理磷酸法与传统磷酸法制备活性炭

林星¹, 杨旋¹, 蔡政汉¹, 林冠烽², 李玉华¹, 黄彪¹

1. 福建农林大学材料工程学院, 福建福州 350108;
2. 福建农林大学金山学院, 福建福州 350002

收稿日期:2017-09-08 出版日期:2018-05-30 发布日期:2018-05-31
通讯作者: 黄彪(1966-),教授,博士生导师,主要从事林产工业的研究;E-mail:fjhuangbiao@hotmail.com。 E-mail:fjhuangbiao@hotmail.com
作者简介:林星(1991-),男,福建龙岩人,硕士生,主要从事生物质能源与炭材料;E-mail:lxyzz1@126.com
基金资助:
福建省科技重大专项基金（2014NZ0003）；福建省教育厅中青年科研项目（JAT160684）；福建省高校杰出青年科研人才培育计划（无编号）

Activated Carbon Prepared with Phosphoric Acid Activation by Mechanical Force Pretreatment Method and Conventional Method

LIN Xing¹, YANG Xuan¹, CAI Zhenghan¹, LIN Guanfeng², LI Yuhua¹, HUANG Biao¹

1. College of Materials Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350108, China;
2. College of Jinshan, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China

Received:2017-09-08 Online:2018-05-30 Published:2018-05-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以速生材红麻秆芯为原料，磷酸为活化剂，采用传统磷酸活化法和机械力预处理磷酸活化法制备红麻秆基活性炭。考察了不同活化时间下2种制备方法对红麻秆基活性炭得率和吸附性能的影响，并借助比表面积分析仪、红外光谱仪表征了活性炭的孔结构及表面官能团特征。结果表明：相比于传统磷酸活化法，机械力作用能使磷酸渗入到原料里层，提高活化效率，使活性炭具有更高的得率、吸附性能、BET比表面积和孔容。在活化时间90 min下，机械力预处理磷酸活化法制得的活性炭得率为50.24%，碘吸附值为1 024 mg/g，亚甲基蓝吸附值为275 mg/g，BET比表面积为1 625.42 m²/g，总孔容为0.762 cm³/g。由孔径分析可知，2种方法制备的活性炭均以微孔为主，并含有一定数量的中孔。由红外光谱分析可知，机械力预处理不会破坏炭化物的基本结构，2种方法制备的活性炭表面均含有—OH、C—O和C＝O等含氧官能团。

关键词: 红麻秆芯, 活性炭, 机械力作用, 预处理, 吸附性能

Abstract: The activated carbon was prepared from kenaf rod core by mechanical force pretreatment process and conventional process with phosphoric acid as activator. The effects of activation time on the yield, adsorption performance of the kenaf rod based-activated carbon were discussed. The pore structure characteristics were characterized by specific surface area and pore size analyzer and the surface functional groups were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The results showed that compared with the conventional process, the mechanical force pretreatment process made phosphoric acid permeate into the inner layer of raw material to strengthen the activation efficiency, which improved the yield, adsorption performance, BET specific surface area and pore volume of kenaf rod based-activated carbon. Under the activation time 90 min, the yield, iodine adsorption value, methylene blue adsorption value, BET specific surface area and total pore volume of the activated carbon prepared by mechanical force pretreatment process were 50.24%, 1 024 mg/g, 275 mg/g, 1 625.42 m²/g and 0.762 cm³/g, respectively. According to pore size analysis, activated carbons prepared by the two methods were mainly microporous and contained a certain number of mesopores. It was known from infrared spectrum analysis that the mechanical force pretreatment process didn't destroy the basic structure of activated carbon. The surface of kenaf rod based-activated carbon prepared by the two methods contained oxygen-containing functional groups, such as —OH,C—O and C=O groups.

Key words: kenaf rod core, activated carbon, mechanochemical process, pretreatment, adsorption performance

中图分类号:

TQ424.1
TQ35

林星, 杨旋, 蔡政汉, 林冠烽, 李玉华, 黄彪. 机械力预处理磷酸法与传统磷酸法制备活性炭[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2018, 52(3): 29-34.

LIN Xing, YANG Xuan, CAI Zhenghan, LIN Guanfeng, LI Yuhua, HUANG Biao. Activated Carbon Prepared with Phosphoric Acid Activation by Mechanical Force Pretreatment Method and Conventional Method[J]. bce, 2018, 52(3): 29-34.

参考文献

[1] QIU J,NING P,WANG X,et al. Removing carbonyl sulfide with metal-modified activated carbon[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering,2016,10(1):11-18.
[2] FATEHIA M H,SHAYEGANA J,ZABIHI M,et al. Functionalized magnetic nanoparticles supported on activated carbon for adsorption of Pb(Ⅱ) and Cr(VI) ions from saline solutions[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering,2017,5(2):1754-1762.
[3] 李旋坤,司知蠢,刘丽萍,等. 破罐用活性炭的制备及应用进展[J]. 科技导报,2016,34(9):86-95.
[4] 卢辛成,蒋剑春,孙康,等. 活性炭对汞离子的吸附动力学研究[J]. 生物质化学工程,2014,48(2):1-7.
[5] 黄丽,刘石彩,朱光真,等. 活性炭对挥发性有机化合物的吸附回收研究进展[J]. 生物质化学工程,2016,50(1):50-56.
[6] 杨巧文,陈思,李鹏飞. 磷酸活化法制备糠醛渣活性炭的研究[J]. 生物质化学工程,2015,49(3):23-26.
[7] 俞志敏,卫新来,娄梅生,等. 氯化锌活化生物质炭制备活性炭及其表征[J]. 化工进展,2014,33(12):3318-3323.
[8] GHANI N T,CHAGHABY G A,MOHAMED H,et al. Optimizing the preparation conditions of activated carbons from olive cake using KOH activation[J]. New Carbon Materials,2016,31(5):492-500.
[9] 黄明堦,陈卫群,陈燕丹,等. 草酸钾活化法制备榴莲壳活性炭及其表征[J]. 环境工程学报,2012,6(10):3730-3734.
[10] 蒋剑春,孙康. 活性炭制备技术及应用研究综述[J]. 林产化学与工业,2017,37(1):1-13.
[11] 许红娅,王芬,解宇星. 机械力化学法合成无机材料的研究[J]. 化工新型材料,2009,37(6):7-8.
[12] 方平平,祁建民,粟建光,等. 世界黄麻红麻生产概况与发展前景[J]. 中国麻业科学,2009,31(3):215-219.
[13] 徐建堂,祁建民,陶爱芬,等. 福建省黄红麻遗传育种与综合利用发展研究报告[J]. 海峡科学,2016,7(1):128-136.
[14] LIPS S J J,HEREDIA G M I,RICHARD G M,et al. Water absorption characteristics of kenaf core to use as animal bedding material[J]. Industrial Crops and Products,2009,29(1):73-79.
[15] QIN C,CHEN Y,GAO J. Manufacture and characterization of activated carbon from marigold straw(Tagetes erecta L) by H₃PO₄ chemical activation[J]. Materials Letters,2014,135:123-126.
[16] 左宋林. 磷酸活化法制备活性炭综述(Ⅰ)-磷酸的作用机理[J]. 林产化学与工业,2017,37(3):1-9.
[17] 李素琼. 机械力-磷酸法木质活性炭的制备[J]. 大庆师范学院学报,2014,34(6):53-62.
[18] LI W,ZHANG L B,PENG J H,et al. Prepation of high surface area activated carbon from tobacco stems with K₂CO₃ activation using microwave radiation[J]. Industrial Crops and Products,2008,24(3):341-347.
[19] CHEN Y D,HUANG B,HUANG M J,et al. On the prepration and charaization of activated carbon from mangosteen shell[J]. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers,2011,42(5):837-842.
[20] 宋磊,张彬,陈家元,等. 废茶活性炭的制备及其孔径结构的控制[J]. 化工进展,2014,33(6):1498-1505.
[21] DENG H,LI G,YANG H,et al. Prepration of activated carbon from cotton stalk by microwave assisted KOH and K₂CO₃ activation[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2010,163(1):373-381.
[22] 江茂生,黄彪,祁建民,等. 红麻秆热解物高吸油特性的形成机理[J]. 中国麻业科学,2009,31(2):143-147.

机械力预处理磷酸法与传统磷酸法制备活性炭

Activated Carbon Prepared with Phosphoric Acid Activation by Mechanical Force Pretreatment Method and Conventional Method

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

投稿指南

在线期刊

相关单位

联系我们

[1]	曾维星,程贤,张笮晦,毕良武,赵振东. 生物预处理技术在天然产物提取中的应用研究进展[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2020, 54(5): 45-52.
[2]	建晓朋,许伟,侯兴隆,刘石彩. 活性炭改性技术研究进展[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2020, 54(5): 66-72.
[3]	任杰,万力,陈楠纬,杨帆,孙水裕,任随周. 咖啡渣活性炭的制备、表征及其对Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附机制研究[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2020, 54(4): 1-8.
[4]	徐茹婷,许伟,卢辛成,孙康. 磷酸法木质活性炭除灰新工艺研究[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2020, 54(4): 37-41.
[5]	王华山,房瑀人,张天航,刘华,王春生. 预处理稻壳及其与杨树锯末掺混燃烧特性和燃烧动力学分析[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2020, 54(3): 1-8.
[6]	李瑶,于淼,吕冬,王立娟. 蒲草叶基活性炭的制备及性能研究[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2020, 54(3): 9-17.
[7]	费海燕,田亚萍,李晗,范方宇,王昌命,郑志锋. 油茶壳微孔活性炭的制备及表征[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2020, 54(3): 25-30.
[8]	刘科,贺静,韦秀丽,蒋滔,唐宁,张德勇. 水稻秸秆渗滤床半固态厌氧发酵性能研究[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2020, 54(1): 1-8.
[9]	邓丛静,马欢欢,周建斌. 改性杏壳活性炭的制备、表征及其吸附乙烯性能[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2019, 53(5): 1-8.
[10]	马红亮,陈健,孔振武. 复合材料用天然植物纤维改性研究进展[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2019, 53(4): 50-58.
[11]	姬文心,曾鸣,丛宏斌,姚宗路,孟海波,赵立欣. 生物质热解反应装置研究现状及展望[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2019, 53(3): 46-58.
[12]	谭文英,程晓红,李硕,杨宇翔. KOH活化法制备棉秆基活性炭及其对含苯酚废水的吸附[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2019, 53(2): 13-18.
[13]	殷二强,王世超,相恒学,周哲,朱美芳. 熔纺Kraft硬木木质素基活性炭纤维的活化工艺及性能研究[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2019, 53(2): 26-34.
[14]	李学琴,王志伟,杨淼,雷廷宙,徐海燕,何晓峰. 基于响应面模型对花生壳基活性炭工艺的优化[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2019, 53(2): 54-60.
[15]	潘娅妮,田小云,董寅生. 磷酸中添加剂对核桃壳活性炭性能的影响[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2019, 53(1): 40-46.